The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law

The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law

Blog Article

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It is usually a effectively-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.

Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)

Individual researchers working on defined research projects intended for scholarly work can utilize the connected form (PDF) to request PACER rate exemptions from multiple courts.

This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more

148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're of your view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're subject to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion might be thought of, however, we have been obvious within our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, matter to availability of vacancy topic to the approval with the competent authority. Read more

Electronic and paper court records retained within the here court site is often viewed at the courthouse for free, however there is usually a cost of 10 cents per page to print from a public access terminal.

Section 302 of your PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject towards the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.

In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected to the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.

Alternative Punishment: In some cases, the court may have the discretion to award life imprisonment being an alternative towards the death penalty. Life imprisonment involves the offender spending the rest of their life behind bars without the possibility of parole or early release.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling on the same kind of case.

A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Progress Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter for a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) on the Pakistan Constitution provides authentic jurisdiction to your Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.